Interview with Coretta Scott King
Interview with Coretta Scott King


Production Team: A, B, C

Interview Date: December 20, 1985

Camera Rolls: 189-197
Sound Rolls: 1145-1148

Interview gathered as part of Eyes on the Prize: America's Civil Rights Years (1954-1965).
Produced by Blackside, Inc.
Housed at the Washington University Film and Media Archive, Henry Hampton Collection.
Editorial Notes:

Preferred citation:
Interview with Coretta Scott King, conducted by Blackside, Inc. on December 20, 1985, for Eyes on the Prize: America's Civil Rights Years (1954-1965). Washington University Libraries, Film and Media Archive, Henry Hampton Collection.

These transcripts contain material that did not appear in the final program. Only text appearing in bold italics was used in the final version of Eyes on the Prize.

INTERVIEW
FILM PRODUCTION TEAM:

Sound Roll 1145-1148, Camera Roll 189-197.

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

…6:00 pm, Friday afternoon, and I have flags.

QUESTION 1
INTERVIEWER:

WE'RE JUST HAVING A CONVERSATION IN THIS. SO, WE'RE GOING TO START OFF IN 1955. YOU'VE BEEN IN MONTGOMERY FOR A VERY SHORT TIME—A YEAR, LESS THAN A YEAR. COULD YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE CITY ITSELF AT THAT TIME WHEN YOU WERE THERE?

Coretta Scott King:

When we moved to Montgomery in 1955, it really was '54, September, the conditions of segregation, and the humiliation that attended that, was very complete. Blacks and whites were completely separated and there had been several incidents where blacks and whites were involved, but blacks attempted to ride the buses, and where they had been beaten and dragged off, arrested and so on. And it was the cradle of the Confederacy, really, and no one ever expected any progress to be made in terms of race relations in Montgomery, in terms of it being the original place or the initiator. We were very happy there, though, in our church situation. Martin was the pastor of Dexter Avenue Baptist Church. And that church had had a history of ministers that had been socially conscious and had been challenging the people to do something about those conditions. He himself, the pastor just before Martin, the Reverend Johns, had called for a boycott. He had talked about other conditions that black people suffered under and challenged them to do something about it. So the situation seemed to have been ready to—for a leader. We did not know that it was the time of an idea when we arrived, but that's exactly what happened. The idea—it was an idea whose time had come. And Martin was there and I think, I often say, that the man, the moment, and the situation came together. And the Montgomery movement started, really, when Rosa Parks sat down on that bus, December the 5th, 19—December the 1st, 1955.

QUESTION 2
INTERVIEWER:

LET ME STOP YOU THERE. FIRST, FIRST, LET ME STOP FOR A MOMENT, PLEASE. YOU ALL OK?

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

Yes, I'm getting some background sound from construction, so if you're wondering, dear editor, that's where it's coming from.

QUESTION 3
INTERVIEWER:

WHAT ATTRACTED YOU BOTH TO MONTGOMERY? YOU WERE RETURNING TO THE SOUTH. HOW DID YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, we were attracted to the South. Not necessarily to Montgomery initially because we both had a commitment to return to the South, and to work in the South to try to bring about some changes in the situation of segregation and the, the lack of dignity and respect that, among—from the black, white community toward the black community. Montgomery happened to be the place, because Martin was invited to, to the pastorate of that church, Dexter Avenue, and when he got the invitation, he said, "This is the kind of church that I would like to begin my ministry in, because the congregation is an enlightened one, and I can preach the way I want to, and continue to develop in my ministry." Most of the people in the Dexter, in the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church had at least college education, more than ninety percent, and many of them were college professors. As a matter of fact, we had about eight or nine Ph.D.s in our congregation, so that, that the people who were in the church were the kind of people who could appreciate a young Ph.D. just out of seminary, with a lot of idealism and so on. Martin's idealism, of course, I think became a combination of idealism and practical reality, I guess, bringing the reality and the idealism closer together as he moved over that first year and into what was to come to be the destiny of his life.

QUESTION 4
INTERVIEWER:

NOW, BEFORE WE GET TO THE ACTUAL BOYCOTT, MAYBE YOU COULD JUST BRIEFLY DESCRIBE FOR US THE SYSTEM OF SEGREGATION ON THE BUSES. I THINK IT'S HARD FOR CHILDREN TODAY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ON A SEGREGATED BUS.

Coretta Scott King:

Well, in Montgomery the buses were set up so that there was a separation between blacks and whites, and there was a section for white people up front and a section for blacks from that point back, but it, it was something that was moveable. If there were no whites boarding the buses, then the sign for blacks could be moved forward. But if most of the space was taken by whites, then it would move backward, and if it happened to be that there were no seats left, then black people would have to stand. Or, if they decide to leave a certain section for whites, then they would have to stand over those empty seats. And it was on that day that Mrs. Parks saw empty seats in the white section and there were none in the black section that she sat down. And when she sat down, that was when she was arrested.

QUESTION 5
INTERVIEWER:

WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS, WAS THE MOST HUMILIATING PART OF IT? WAS IT—IT'S AN INTERESTING QUESTION TO ME. I THINK SOMETHING ABOUT THE PUBLICNESS OF THE SITUATION—THAT YOU PAY, YOU'RE IN A PUBLIC…

Coretta Scott King:

Well, in some instances they would have you pay in the front where the driver was, and then you'd walk out of the bus again and go to the back, particularly when your section is in the back. And that happened, I guess a lot of the time blacks would pay their money and then go out of the bus again, to the back door, and come in the back of the bus and take their seat. That was—that kind of obvious humiliation made people feel something was wrong with them, that they couldn't walk through the aisle to the seats, that they had to go outside and come back in where they were least exposed to the whites who were seated on the buses. And the way blacks were talked to, I mean, they never were—the way they were looked at even, I mean, there was always, you know, tension and feelings of resentment, it seemed and hostility, which made you feel less, less than, you know, human. And, and the way they were spoken to, the tone of voice and all. Very degrading. They were called by, not by their names, or even most times, it would be, "Boy, Girl, you get back. Move over. Let that lady pass." You know, anything, I mean, it was just always a reminder that you were less than. And I remember when—and this was true in Montgomery. When, when I was in school, we used to walk to school every day, a couple of miles. Even when we lived in the city to—I lived, I was born and reared in the country—but I went to the town of Marion to go to high school. And when the white children would, would meet us, they were going to their schools, and we were going in the opposite direction. We were going to ours, and they would walk down the sidewalk and, and they filled up the sidewalk, and we would have to walk off of the sidewalk in order to let them pass. And if you didn't walk off you would get knocked off, or bumped into. It was that kind of thing. Or else you might end up into a fight, and nobody wanted to get into a fight, because, you, you know, you could be arrested and that would be a real serious situation there. So it was always a very uneasy kind of a thing when you saw a group of white youngsters coming down the street, and you had a similar group of black youngsters. …

QUESTION 6
INTERVIEWER:

THAT'S WONDERFUL. THAT'S VERY VIVID. CAN WE STOP FOR A MOMENT?

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

OK, the sound is from the air conditioning also. The construction is gone now.

Coretta Scott King:

Segregation was a way of life in the South, and the South we returned to in Montgomery was the South pretty much as we left it. And if you were a person who was educated, lived in a black community, your living, where you lived, usually, you were segregated from whites. You'd—and if you worked as a professional, you worked in your own institutions. You didn't have to encounter whites a lot, except when you go downtown and go into the stores. If you, most of us had cars, so we didn't have to ride the buses. It was the masses of people, the working people, who had to ride the buses. So one could avoid a lot of the day-to-day humiliations if you were so-called middle class, 'cause we had, as I said, separate, our separate lives. We had our own community of, of professionals and so forth, which was very small, but it was there, nevertheless. So you didn't have to encounter it. Martin and I, therefore—

QUESTION 7
INTERVIEWER:

KEEP THE THOUGHT RIGHT THERE. WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A QUICK CHANGE.

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

That's a camera roll-out. We're going to 190.

QUESTION 8
INTERVIEWER:

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT CHALLENGES…

Coretta Scott King:

Martin and I were new to the…

QUESTION 9
INTERVIEWER:

I'M SORRY I STEPPED ON YOUR WORDS, START AGAIN.

Coretta Scott King:

Martin and I were new to the community, therefore, our first concern was to become adjusted to the community—to get to know people, to get involved with the church, and to really spend time trying to get to know the church people, and to—for them to be comfortable with us, and vice versa. And he was also working for, he was writing his dissertation, trying to finish that up, the first year. However, he had presented a program to the church, which they adopted in December of that year. We started there in September, and then December his church program and budget were presented, and he had a very ambitious program. We were very excited about—the church people were very excited about what he had proposed, but he had to finish his dissertation. He got his doctorate in June of 1955. So then he was able to spend more time in the church. We had looked forward, in that second year, to spending a lot of time getting the church program going, and all. And as a matter of fact, I discouraged him from taking a position with the NAACP, as President, which he had been offered. And this was just a few days bef—prior to December the 1st, 1955, when he told me he had been invited to serve as President, and I said, "Well, you know, you need to really get your church program off the ground. And I hope you won't take that now." And he seemed as if he really wanted to. He was considering it. So one night he came home and he said, "I've decided to take it." And I said, "Oh, no." And by that time he thought, you know, I really believed it. His mother was there, because my oldest child was just a few weeks old. And then he said, after he thought we were totally convinced, "Oh no, I was just kidding." And it was good that he didn't take it, because if he had taken it, it would have been a problem for him, later on, especially as he became the spokesman for the movement.

QUESTION 10
INTERVIEWER:

TALKING ABOUT THE START OF THE BOYCOTT, COULD YOU TALK ABOUT HOW YOU HEARD ABOUT IT, AND WHAT YOUR HUSBAND'S REACTION WAS? WAS HE IMMEDIATELY WILLING TO REALLY BE PART OF IT AND LEAD IT, OR DID HE HAVE TO REALLY THINK ABOUT IT?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, he had no thought that—Martin and I were home, I believe, when, together, when the phone call came from E.D. Nixon, who was a, a leader in the community. He was the President of the NAACP and had worked very actively in the community on some of these problems, and had called for black people to kind of rise up and do something about it. And he felt that this was an opportunity with these young ministers being in town. Dr. King was at Dexter and Reverend Abernathy was at First Baptist Church, and they were very good friends and working together. And he called the both of them, separately of course, and suggested that there ought to be a boycott of those buses. And he started giving background on the history of what had happened with black people, the confrontations that had taken place over the years. And I think, in the conversation, as I understand it, that they had, they decided the ministerial group and some leaders, and that meeting. Martin offered to have that meeting at his church, but it would be the head of the ministerial association, the ministers, it was the Black Ministers' Alliance, that would spearhead it, and then the other leadership was invited in. They had the meeting at Dexter and things didn't go well. The first, the first night that they had this meeting, because somehow the person who was involved in the leadership, perhaps was not the best person to chair the meeting. But somehow they got through it and they did make some plans. The plans, the plans called for a one-day boycott of the buses on December the 5th. And they sent out leaflets all over town, and they talked to the ministers to go to their congregations on Sunday and encourage them to stay off the buses, for one day, to protest this very dreadful situation of Mrs. Parks being arrested, and they all were very excited about it. But then the thing that made for more excitement was the fact that one of the leaflets was picked up by a maid and taken to work with her, and her, mistress, or her boss found it, or took it and read it, and then she called the local newspaper and wanted them to publicize what these blacks were up to, so everybody would know about it in the white community. Well, that was really a great way to publicize our cause. And nobody signed it, you know, they didn't know who was doing it. The whole idea was not to put anybody's name out there. And they realized that there would be some retaliation. So they were trying to get it started before anyone was identified with it. So, the Monday night, December the 5th, there was to be a mass meeting at the Holt Street Baptist Church. In the afternoon of the 5th, there was another meeting of the leadership. And at, that was the time when they decided to form an organization, and in the process of forming an organization they had to select a leader, a spokesperson, a president. And when Martin got to the meeting, he was a little late, and they were talking about the leadership, and they were discussing the fact that whose, whoever named, whosever [sic] name was, was projected, that that person might become a target. And I think then people began to sort of resist the whole idea. And when E.D. Nixon proposed Martin's name, you know, Martin said, "Well, you know, I'm not sure I'm the best person for this position, since I'm new in the community, and, but if, if no one else is going to serve you know, someone has to do it. And, I'd be glad to. I'd be glad to try to do it." And of course, I guess, everybody then assured him they wanted him. So he came home very excited about the fact that he had to give the keynote speech that night at the mass meeting. He only had twenty minutes to prepare his speech. ** So, I was thinking to myself how wonderful it would be if I could get out of this house and go, but my baby was a few weeks old, and my doctor said you have to stay in for a whole month. You know, I didn't have any problems, having the baby, but to stay in a whole month, that was what was required by my doctor. So I was going to be obedient. But then Martin went to his study and he made an outline, as he very often did. And naturally he couldn't write a speech in twenty minutes that was so fateful, really. I mean, that, that particular occasion was to determine the, the future, the destiny of that whole movement. And I think he understood that, because the boycott had been so effective, all day. Martin said it had been ninety-nine and nine-tenths percent, I believe, effective. And therefore if people came out in large numbers that night, then we really had, you know, a movement, and we had to find a way to continue it. And being the spokesman was a trem—pretty tremendous job, an awesome job, really, and not even knowing where it was leading. So when he got there—he told me when he returned that, that there were so many people, they couldn't get near the church. And they, when they got, finally got up to the church, they almost had to be carried over the shoulders of people, he and Reverend Abernathy, in order to get to the pulpit. And of course the excitement of the crowd, certainly, generated great enthusiasm and inspiration in Martin. And he made, I think, a very important speech, that really did determine which direction the movement would go, as well as the tone, I guess, maybe more importantly the tone of the movement. It was to be a nonviolent movement, and he called for Christian love, and to not retaliate with violence. That no matter what violence was perpetrated against us, that we must not retaliate, but that we must love our white brother and let him know that we love them. And that we must continue to struggle in a determined manner so that we would, if we would do that and we would, you know, do it, I mean, as he called for a kind of unity, that he felt that future generations would have to say that, pause and say that there lived a people, a black people, a great people, who injected a new meaning into our civilization. And this was you know, our overwhelming challenge, our responsibility, and our overwhelming challenge, and our responsibility, I believe is what he said. Fortunately, I got someone to tape it, so we have a copy of the speech which we were able to use in the film, the documentary Montgomery to Memphis, which really gave a very important beginning.

QUESTION 11
INTERVIEWER:

I, I IN FACT WOULD LIKE TO—I WANTED TO MAKE A NOTE TO MYSELF TO TALK ABOUT—

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

That's a roll-out on 190. We're going to 191.

QUESTION 12
INTERVIEWER:

…TALK ABOUT THIS, THIS DOUBT AND THIS KIND OF WISDOM.

Coretta Scott King:

I think that the, perhaps the greatest struggle and, and perhaps you could say the—stop, I have to get some water.

QUESTION 13
INTERVIEWER:

…AND YOU WANT TO REMEMBER, WE'RE JUST HAVING A CONVERSATION.

Coretta Scott King:

Martin found himself in the leadership of a movement that was applying a technique that had been applied very successfully in India, the technique of nonviolence. And it was not something that he had, he had thought it through to a large extent, in terms of how nonviolence could be applied, but he had not thought through exactly, I'm sure, how he would do it in a particular situation. He went back and read books on Gandhi and on—I'm sure he must have read, I think he heard him say Thoreau, and the things that he had studied in college, in theological seminary, and also in his studies for his doctoral degree and all of that. But then I think he, his greatest source was from, I think, the Bible, and the teachings of, of Christ. Because as a Christian minister, he felt that his understanding, of course, of nonviolence, was that nonviolence was based on, on a certain principles that were the same principles that, as a Christian, he had embraced. Love, the foundation of the Christian faith is love, and, and of course, truth is another important tenet. And he understood love in the unconditional sense. And he also understood, you know, the, in the life of Christ. He had demonstrated in his own life, I think, an example of nonviolence and, and in terms of his ability to not…to become a part of an unjust system, to cooperate with it, but to also, you know, condemn it, and to, as Christ would, to change it. He said, "I got my motivation from Jesus—my motivation and inspiration from Jesus, and my techniques from Gandhi." And when he was criticized about boycotting, because you would put individuals out of business, the nonviolent philosophy says you don't focus on the individual but on the system. It was the system of segregation that had caused individuals to behave unjustly and so he said, "I'm not trying to put anybody out of business, I'm just trying to put justice in business." And when you, when you understand that—that this is what you really have to do, in order to follow the nonviolent discipline and—which is, if it's followed, it becomes a transforming force, as well, for change. I mean, the actions of the individuals are, are effective, but you do it in a spirit of recon—love and reconciliation. You don't do it in a way that you tried to really hurt the individual personality. Personality is sacred, and he and it's to be respected. But it's the behavior that we wanted to change and that is what he became to, to understand. And I think at that point, then, he felt much better about, you know, about his actions. But when it's raised in the media, when it's raised by individuals, you do have to think about it. And I think he grew in his understanding and his ability to, I think, articulate the meaning of nonviolence and to translate nonviolence into a kind of action program, because that's what Gandhi was able to do.

QUESTION 14
INTERVIEWER:

STOP FOR A MOMENT. YOU'RE HAVING WIND NOISES THERE.

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

This is camera roll 191. Continuation of 191. Reference tone. Continuation of interview with Mrs. Coretta Scott King.

QUESTION 15
INTERVIEWER:

…DESCRIBE ONE OF THE MASS MEETINGS. JUST THINK OF ONE AND LET US TAKE US THERE IN A WORD PICTURE.

Coretta Scott King:

Mass meetings usually were attended by the maids and cooks and janitors and people who really used the buses a lot. And they would leave work and come to the church very early. And ** they would start prayer services. I think people looked forward to coming to the church, where they could just kind of, you know, in a sense, relax and fellowship and commune, and I think be renewed and inspired. I think the prayers and the singing served as, as a kind of a therapeutic thing for them in terms of giving them the strength to continue the next day. And as Christian people, they believed very much, you know, in prayer, and the songs of, of the faith, and all. And just, just people coming together in solidarity and having and sharing some of the same kinds of experiences. It helped them to go back out the next day, to face whatever insults that they were going to have to face. And when you think about some of those people who really were working for people who really were very angry, and who would talk about the leadership, and they'd have to listen to that and not say a word. I mean, they'd have to—and maybe some of them would listen and almost agree, knowing that they didn't agree. You know, it was because they—in those days, you, you couldn't express your feelings if you were on that other end, you know, as, as a person who worked for someone, 'cause they—-very often, they'd been good to them in terms of helping them with their families, doing extra things. They didn't pay them very much, but they would do other things for them, and, and I think they loved them in a patronizing kind of way, you know, paternalistically. There were some genuine, genuine relationships, I'm sure. There were some. Then they would be there, singing and praying for hours, sometimes, before the program actually started, the main part of the mass meeting. ** I think the mass meetings started around seven, seven thirty. And by the time the leadership got there, the clergy and all, and they started the main part of the program, which was to discuss where things were and whatever incidents that had taken place, to keep them informed, and then to give them strategy, direction on the strategies the next, the next step and all of that. And 'cause people would wait to get the word. What's Dr. King's going to say? Dr. Abernathy would speak first, usually. And he would—had the ability to really make them laugh and maybe make them cry some. I mean, that's 'cause he would—he told jokes—he, he really knew how to, you know, kind of get them in the mood, ** so they could sit and listen to what Dr. King had to say. And so the combination of the two styles was very good, very helpful, I think. Not that Reverend Abernathy wasn't ever serious, but he really had that ability, to kind of, you know, speak to people right where they, they were at the moment. And, I guess you'd call it a kind of folksy quality. He was able to do that because that was a part of his style. Whereas with Martin, he was more, I guess what you would consider formal, and he would come along with a very thoughtful message, ** a very analytical message, his main message usually was. And then as a preacher, I mean, he got emotional and involved in his message. But by the time he got to that point, I mean, they had listened and they had understood what he was talking about, and with the sincerity that he had, you know, and his great oratory, and his charisma and all of that, and he moved people. He persuaded them, you know, when he talked to them about the meaning of not, of, of being willing to absorb the suffering and even the physical blows without retaliating, and what this would mean in terms of, of the kind of, being a kind of redeeming force for change. And that, making them feel very good about what they were doing, that they were making a contribution just by being there, by putting their bodies, so to speak, on the line, by being a part of the protest and being identified with it. He also helped them to understand that maybe there were some people who could not be there, because they, they played a different role, but those people gave funds and supported. Maybe not everyone has to be here, physically, and be seen, 'cause if you worked for the state in those days, you were a teacher, you may not be able to come to a mass meeting and, and keep your job. But some people had enough courage to lose their job. He talked about—it's important, what we're doing is important. It's important enough to lose a job. I mean, a job is not important.

QUESTION 16
INTERVIEWER:

WE NEED TO MAKE A STOP AND CHANGE HERE. LET ME PICK UP WITH YOU, LET ME …

FILM PRODUCTION TEAM:

[SECOND STICKS]

QUESTION 17
INTERVIEWER:

AND, AND HOW WOULD THEY, WOULD THEY WITH SINGING—

Coretta Scott King:

What happened throughout the mass meeting is that there were songs interspersed. They had an order of service and so they would—what would happen when they would come and sing, without, without an instrument at all. Sometimes they would do what you call the long meter, and the—with the hymns of the church, and so on, was that they would have someone who played the piano or the organ, and they would start, you know, just like they start at the church services, really. And they would sing the songs and hymns of the church: "What a Friend We Have in Jesus," "What A Fellowship," "What a Joy Divine," "Leaning on the Everlasting Arm." They may sing, "Oh Lord, I want to be a Christian, in My Heart," which is a spiritual, and they would for a long—I guess, throughout Montgomery and into maybe as far as into Albany, I, they—there was not a lot of use of what we called freedom songs. They would do the spiritual, "Oh, Freedom Over Me," "Freedom Before I Be a Slave," "I'll be Buried in My Grave and Go Home to My Lord and Be Free." Or they would sing, "Go Down Moses," "Way Down in Egypt's Land," but aside from that, these were spirituals, they were mostly things that they knew, and it was later, as I said, that the, the spirituals were taken, and they substituted words, and made them more relevant to what we were doing…

QUESTION 18
INTERVIEWER:

WE'LL GET TO THOSE LATER.

Coretta Scott King:

Yes, and, and so, they would end of course, after Martin's message, with a song and a prayer, a benediction and prayer. And everybody would go home, you know, feeling, you know, good and inspired and ready to go back the next morning to a long day of well, you know, what work, hard work. But they, I think they could take it a little bit better, really, even the work that they—that had been difficult, became easier. It was something about that experience that gave you all—gave all of us so much, so much hope and inspiration and as the more we got into it, the more we, we had the feeling that something could be done about the situation, that we could change it. And that …

QUESTION 19
INTERVIEWER:

DO YOU THINK THAT YOUR HUSBAND WAS EVER DISCOURAGED ACTUALLY IN THIS TIME? DO YOU REMEMBER ANY PARTICULAR TIMES WHEN HE SAID, THIS ISN'T GOING TO WORK, WE CAN'T GO ON?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, I don't think he said it that way. There were moments when he was, you know, he was not—he didn't know quite which way to go, and quite what to do next. And you know, there are these moments when you, when you're not sure what is going to happen and what is the best strategy to use. I think there were times in the early struggle. But what they did was to sit down together and they would, they would plan and they would come up with a, a way around the situation. I think that the times when it looked as if they were going to try to enjoin the carpool, through the courts, to stop—to stop them. Or when they were rounding up all of the leadership and arresting them, there's always a concern, if you take all the leaders to jail, who's going to lead? And Martin did not like to go, go to jail first, he would let others go and then when they were doing a campaign that was extended, and then he would go, toward the end. Because he needed to stay there to keep the momentum going and to generate support, you know, around the country. And this was later on.

QUESTION 20
INTERVIEWER:

BUT, BUT WHAT ABOUT THAT FIRST TIME WHEN HE WENT…

Coretta Scott King:

[cough] I'm going to have to stop.

QUESTION 21
INTERVIEWER:

AND SO THAT EVEN IN THAT FIRST TIME, THERE WAS NO FEELING OF SHAME AT BEING CONVICTED?

Coretta Scott King:

Martin had talked about the, the necessity to go to jail for what we believed in, for what they believed in, for the righteous cause, and he kept saying, "Our cause is just, we are, we are moving on the side of God, and God is with us in our struggle and we are right." And I think people felt that there was a rightness and he said, "It means, it means sac—it means suffering and sacrificing, going to jail, and we will go to jail, probably, and we will transform these dungeons of shame into a haven of freedom and justice." I mean, you know, he had a way of turning words and phrases that, you know, would, would inspire people and so that most people went to jail gladly and willingly. They were, you know, going to jail for my freedom is, it's quite different from going to jail because I've committed a crime. Because I think they always knew that it was not a crime. Their only crime was that they wanted freedom, and that was a great way in which to express it, by going to jail as a protest against it. So that you inspire many others and that you do something about changing that system as you continue to fill the jails, 'cause he really encouraged them to fill the jails.

QUESTION 22
INTERVIEWER:

NOT IN MONTGOMERY, IN MONTGOMERY WE WEREN'T FILLING THE JAILS. WE'LL COME TO THAT THOUGH. I'M JUST GOING TO FINISH OFF THE MONTGOMERY THING. ACTUALLY, ONLY TWO MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT MONTGOMERY. WE'LL GET INTO THE FULLER MOVEMENT TIMES. ONE THOUGHT IS THAT AT THE BEGINNING OF MONTGOMERY, THE MONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT, DR. KING WAS A LOCAL PREACHER, A YOUNG MAN WHO HAD JUST FINISHED HIS DISSERTATION, WAS IN HIS FIRST PULP—MAJOR, MAJOR ROLE, HAD HIS FIRST CONGREGATION. AT THE END OF IT, HE WAS A NATIONAL LEADER. I'M WONDERING WHAT THAT MEANT TO YOU, AS HIS WIFE? IT MUST HAVE BEEN A BIG CHANGE FOR YOU.

Coretta Scott King:

I think it was a, an evolution that we were all experiencing because I was very much involved as an activist in college. So that when Montgomery started you know, I was very excited about all this because my only really regret was that I could not be there, all the time, when the action was taking place, but I was there in spirit. The movement started spontaneously and our home became the place where everybody met, where—it was a gathering place—it was, the focus was really right there in the parsonage. Where the leadership came, so much of the time, to meet, and so I was able to keep abreast of everything to it. And I watched the news, a lot of my husband's interviews were held at the house, most of the people who visited Montgomery, and there were people who started coming from all around the world, very quickly. The news spread fast, you know, 50,000 people, this had never happened anywhere where 50,000 black people stood up in solidarity and, and, and were boycotting the buses. And it was working. So that was quite a phenomenon. And it attracted attention as far away as South Africa. In that year, it was reported by the press that there was a boycott in Johannesburg, South Africa, there was one in Tallahassee, Florida, one in Mobile, that the Reverend Lowery led, and one in Birmingham that Fred Shuttlesworth, and of course, C. K. Steele in Tallahassee. And in Atlanta, later, Reverend William Holmes Borders led the one in Atlanta. So there were all these movements springing up right after Montgomery, during the year '56, and people from the North were so excited and they were coming. I mean, people were coming from all over, just to, to talk, to be with people, to see what they could do, to give encouragement. If they were white, it was more difficult for them to be visible, but they would give support. But blacks were, you know, offering support and wanting to be a part of, and naturally, they didn't live there so boycotting the buses, it was difficult for them to, to help very much with that, except by not patronizing. But with morale and things, they would come and visit the meetings. And just to have these people coming in, and, and, and telling us how proud they were, and how, how they felt, you know, more like human beings, because somewhere people were standing up for, for freedom, and they know that they would win. And you know things of this kind really encouraged us to continue. Now, when Martin first was arrested—was for a traffic violation which they—it was a rather trumped-up charge. And that was in January of 1956, early, and, and, and that was going alone. You know, he did go alone, I mean, that was not planned. There were times when he went to jail when it wasn't planned. But when they planned to go to jail that's when, you know, people were prepared, because a part of the process of nonviolence is preparation.

QUESTION 23
INTERVIEWER:

NOW IN TERMS OF THAT JANUARY, THERE WAS—I WONDER IF I SHOULD ASK YOU ABOUT THE TIME THE HOUSE WAS BOMBED, IN JANUARY OF '56. NOW WHY DO YOU THINK THAT, THAT, THE—DR. KING'S REACTION WAS NO RETALIATION? HE WAS VERY CLEAR ABOUT THAT. WHAT DO YOU THINK GAVE HIM THAT STRENGTH TO NOT BE ANGRY ABOUT HIS WIFE AND HIS CHILD BEING UNDER ATTACK?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, I think it was his, his—first of all, his understanding of the Christian faith, what it means to be truly Christian, because we are taught that we shouldn't, not hate. We should love, even our enemies. We are taught that, that we must forgive, I mean, and we must do it many, many times, not just one time. I think there's one passage that says seventy times seven. And, and so Martin was understanding that, you know, if he was true to his commitment to the Christian ministry, that he had a responsibility to fight for the liberation of his people—because Christianity is a liberating religion.

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

That's a roll-out on 192. We're going to 193.

QUESTION 24
INTERVIEWER:

HOW DID YOU FEEL PERSONALLY WHEN THE BOYCOTT WAS OVER? DID YOU THINK YOU'D WON THE WAR?

Coretta Scott King:

I knew that this was the beginning of many struggles, but I thought that the fact that we were successful in desegregating the buses and that this led to not only Montgomery buses being desegregated, but it would, it was a, an action that would cause the desegregation of buses trans—and transportation, of transportation anywhere, wherever it was segregated. And we knew that once we broke the barrier, that it would be easier for other areas of segregation to be eliminated. And we knew that we would have to go on. At first, we didn't even ask for desegregation. We only asked for a, a more humane system of segregation on the buses. And when the opposition refused to grant that, then we realized that they wouldn't grant anything anyway, so we might as well ask for, you know, complete desegregation. And that's what we went for, and we realized we had to go for broke, so to speak. ** So, the, the fact that people were able to stick together for that length of time and that there was a favorable ruling from the courts on this, it meant that the courts—the climate was created around which the courts could act. And we realized that what we had to do was to take each situation, you know, separately, and continue to work on it until we had achieved that desegregation of public accommodations, and then the right to vote, and so on.

QUESTION 25
INTERVIEWER:

WERE YOU EXHILARATED? DID YOU AND YOUR HUSBAND CELEBRATE?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, we didn't actually have a celebration of that kind. Martin helped the following to understand that you—when you have a, a victory, or when you, you achieve the goal that you've set, that you don't—you take it humbly. He said, when we go back to the buses, we're not going to go back bragging about the fact that you know, we won, but that we go back, and we try to win friends with those people, you know, who were not friendly with us before, because part of the process of nonviolence is to achieve a reconciliation of when, when the struggle has been won. And if you do it nonviolently, it is, it is more—it is easier to have that, that kind of, of a reconciliation take place. But if it's violent, then it's almost impossible. And so where we had a great sense of fulfillment in what we had done—and Montgomery itself was a period in my life that I just—I feel, I felt so much fulfillment. It was a realization of a lot of things in terms of where I should be, what I should be doing with my own life. I came to realize that, that I was supposed to be involved in, and to be there, that when I had made the decision to marry Martin that that was the decision that would determine my destiny. I knew that, but then I—it was like having a realization and then a moment of truth, in the situation that reaffirmed the feeling that I had that perhaps this would lead to when I made the decision, that it would lead to a different kind of life. And that there was a destiny involved. So this was sort of like yeah, there had to be, because this kind of thing could never just happen. Not in Montgomery, Alabama. Not, you know, here's a young man who'd not had any experience, but all of a sudden he emerges as the leader and the spokesperson, and a great hero of the people. A great symbol of the aspirations and hopes of, of millions of people by that time.

QUESTION 26
INTERVIEWER:

I'M GOING TO JUMP YOU AHEAD A LITTLE BIT HERE, TO 1960, AND I'M GOING TO ASK YOU FOR JUST A—A SERIES OF LITTLE SHORT STORIES OF HOW YOU REMEMBER THINGS. I'M THINKING ABOUT THE TIME THAT DR. KING IS JAILED FOR PARTICIPATING WITH THE STUDENTS IN A SIT-IN IN THE DEPARTMENT STORE IN ATLANTA. IN RICH'S DEPARTMENT STORE. AND I—COULD YOU JUST GIVE US A LITTLE DESCRIPTION OF YOUR FEARS ABOUT HIS SAFETY AT THAT TIME?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, I was expecting my third child, which, who was, who's Dexter, who is now twenty-four, almost twenty-five. And I guess when you're pregnant you feel more insecure with your husband being away. And being in jail for any length of time is always a problem. Martin, Martin had decided earlier on in Montgomery that he would not bail himself out of jail, whenever he went. He would stay there and, as a part of the protest, or a part of the nonviolent strategy, to stay in jail until something had changed, in terms of granting part of what, what was being asked, or what have you. In the early days, everybody was arrested and got out of jail, but, but what, what, what I think happened, when we came to Atlanta and was arrested at Rich's, is that he had already decided he would not accept bail unless something happened in the situation that had improved it. And so when he—I knew he was going to stay in jail then, and I was expecting. It just created a lot more of a hardship ‘cause I wanted to visit him, because I know, he really didn't like to go to jail. He used to say, anyone who has sense does not like to go to jail, all the time. He said, but I go to jail because I must. And, and he felt it was necessary for someone to do it. And if that was his role and the price he had to pay to free some people, he would be willing to do that. So as I was expecting, and having to go back and forth to jail, you know, it was very tiring and wearying, but I expected Martin to come out of jail when everybody else came out, once there was a settlement reached. And I found out, when the rest of them left, they let them out, and there was some settlement made between the department store and the business community, and all, and, and the student and the leadership of the movement. They kept Martin, and we didn't understand why, and it took a while for me to find out, why Martin couldn't come out of jail. And being pregnant as I was, I was very immediately depressed, because I had expected to see him, and when they said he had to be taken to DeKalb County—because this was Fulton County, in Atlanta, where he was—then I didn't understand what was going to happen. And then finally I found out it was about a traffic charge, that had, that had been made earlier. And that the judge had discretionary powers, even, and that really disturbed me. But we went to court and we had good lawyers, in DeKalb County, and we thought that he was going to have to—he would come out soon. But the judge, after the hearing, said, "I, I find the defendant guilty, and sentence him to six months hard labor in the Reedsville State Penitentiary." And I wasn't expecting it. And it was just like a, you know, almost like a bombshell. And the students were very upset, and my sister-in-law was upset and we were all feeling so tense that—

QUESTION 27
INTERVIEWER:

COULD WE STOP FOR A MOMENT PLEASE? I'M SORRY. YOU HAD GOTTEN TO THE POINT OF SAYING THAT YOU WERE REALLY UPSET. I THINK WE CAN TELL, I THINK WE CAN TELL ABOUT LEADING UP TO THE CALL FROM JOHN KENNEDY BUT IF YOU WOULD JUST TELL US ABOUT GETTING IT. WE CAN, WE CAN TELL HOW, HOW YOU, YOU TRIED TO GET THROUGH TO HIM. BUT IF YOU COULD JUST TELL US WHAT IT WAS LIKE TO HEAR FROM HIM AND WHAT THAT MEANT.

Coretta Scott King:

Let me—Martin disliked being in jail, as I said, intensely, and while I was trying to think of a way to get to see him, eight hours, maybe, away by car and being pregnant, I had this very uplifting thing to happen. And it was a call from Senator Kennedy, John F. Kennedy. He called and said, "Mrs. King how are you? I understand that you are expecting your third child, and I just wanted you to know that I was thinking about you, and Dr. King, and concerned about your well-being. This must be very difficult for you." And I said, "Yes, it is." And he said, "Well, I just want you to know that if there's anything I can do, to be of help, to please call on me. Feel free to call on me." And I said, " Well I appreciated this so much, and I would appreciate anything that you could do to be of help," ‘cause I didn't know what else to say. I was really not quite sure what the motivation was of this call. He was running for office, and, and this was just a few days before the election, in November—in October, late October, and I, I understood all the political implications, so I didn't know what to say. But I was very pleased—

QUESTION 28
INTERVIEWER:

WE JUST RUN OUT.

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

OK, that was a roll-out on 193. I'm also going to sound roll, sound roll 1147, 20/85, Eyes on the Prize. Sound roll 1147. Camera roll 194. Reference tone. Continuation of interview with Mrs. Coretta Scott King.

Coretta Scott King:

I was very depressed about Martin being in jail and being so far away, and knowing I couldn't get to see him in less than a whole day's journey and back and, and suddenly I got this very unexpected but uplifting telephone call from Senator John F. Kennedy. And he was campaigning and was at O'Hare Airport, and called, and said, "Hello, Mrs. King, this is Senator Kennedy and I'm calling because I wanted to let you know I was thinking about you. How are you? I understand you are expecting your third child." I was amazed you know, that he even said third child. Someone of course had to tell him, but anyway, it was a very personal touch, and he said, "I'm thinking about you and your husband, and I know this must be very difficult for you. If there's anything I can do to be of help, I want you to please feel free to call on me." And I didn't quite know what to say, except to thank him, and say, "Well, I really appreciate this and if there is anything that you can do, I would deeply appreciate it." ** And of course knowing the implications of all of this, he, he was—it was toward the, the end of the month of October and the election was just a few days away, the presidential election, and I didn't quite know what to make of it. Very shortly afterwards, a reporter called and said, "I understand the Senator Kennedy called you, what did he say?" And I said, "Well why don't you ask him?" I said, "You know, I really don't feel free to tell you. Why don't you ask him?" So anyway, my father-in-law and I were on our way to see a lawyer, because we were trying to figure out a way to get Martin out of jail legally, 'cause we knew the judge had discretionary powers, and the only legal recourse was probably through the Board of Corrections. In the meantime, I called, when I returned from this visit to the lawyer, I returned, I made a call to Senator Kennedy's campaign, and spoke to a person that I knew, Harris Wofford, who was working with Senator Kennedy. And I told him about this call and asked him his advice. He said, "Oh, tell them," he said, "There were a lot of reporters around, and there were, you know, some of the human rights people. And so, it's all right, you just tell them what happened." So then I started receiving more phone calls, and of course, I did report it, but that call was a very important call. I think it, it did turn the tide, because Martin was released from jail, in, I guess in about…the next day, actually, the next day. This was on the day that he had been taken to Reedsville, that I got the call, and the next day he was released, late in the day. And then we went to a mass meeting that night, as we usually did, to go to our churches to have a meeting, and Daddy King said "You know, this was the first time we'd had a Catholic to run for President." And most black people were like most other Americans about Catholics, I guess. We were not sure about Nixon, but Nixon had befriended a lot of people. And so Daddy King said, "I have a sackful of votes, and I'm going to take them to the White House and place them at Senator Kennedy's feet." And of course, essentially what he was saying, that is, he was going to vote for him. And actually, I think the difference in that election, which was very close, had to do with Martin's—his intercession in Martin's case, because Senator Kennedy won by a very narrow margin, less that 100,000 votes.

QUESTION 29
INTERVIEWER:

THAT TOOK CARE OF THE LAST THREE QUESTIONS. AND THEN GO AHEAD TO ALBANY. WYATT T. WALKER SAID TO US THAT IF SCLC HAD HAD MORE CONTROL OF THINGS, IF THEY'D HAD STRONGER CONTROL, AND DR. KING HAD HAD STRONGER CONTROL, THINGS WOULD HAVE TURNED OUT BETTER IN ALBANY. DO YOU THINK THAT DR. KING WAS HIMSELF FRUSTRATED ABOUT THE LACK OF COHERENCE IN ALBANY?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, I don't think that, I mean, I, I'm just talking, I'm not speaking about what Reverend Walker said. I'm speaking about what I understood of Albany and what I think the difficulty was in Albany, and I think Albany is perhaps one of the least understood of the campaigns. We were dealing with a more humane police force, number one, law enforcement body, and they, they did what they were supposed to do. When you break the law, what do you expect? You expect to get arrested and go to jail. In, in other communities, they were more brutal, they were more inhumane, and there were confrontations. And very often, it was the confrontations that caused people to pay attention to what was going on. In Albany we had a federal injunction placed against us. And when the federal court started ruling against us, that created a whole different thing in terms of what strategy do you use now? Because up to that point, Martin had been willing to break state laws, that were unjust laws, and our ally was the federal judiciary. And so if we would take our case to the federal court, and the federal court ruled against us, what recourse did we have? ** So we were working in concert with the federal laws, all the time, in the South, up to that point. But, so what we were—he was asking Senator Kennedy, I mean President Kennedy, and the Attorney General, Bobby Kennedy, for an intercession in Albany. That, that they needed, he needed some intercession. He was asking them, the Justice Department, to intercede, as a friend of the court, so that that injunction could be lifted. Because if you break the federal injunction, that would be a problem. And that was essentially the problem in Albany.

QUESTION 30
INTERVIEWER:

WAS HE FRUSTRATED BY ALBANY, DO YOU THINK?

Coretta Scott King:

Naturally you would be frustrated if you were pleading to the federal government who was friendly and they did not act. You see, it's, it's important to understand this, and I have to go further for people to understand what I'm saying.

QUESTION 31
INTERVIEWER:

WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THIS WITH OTHER SPEAKERS TOO. I MEAN …

Coretta Scott King:

No, no, I want to say this—if, even if you don't take it on. What I'm saying is that in Birmingham, for instance, in Birmingham, for instance, he made the decision that he would break the injunction. But he had a situation in Birmingham with the brutality that caused the nation to rise up against that. So he had, you know, sort of a more moral authority in Birmingham, because of the reaction of the opposition.

QUESTION 32
INTERVIEWER:

STOP. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THIS AGAIN BECAUSE THAT'S A VERY IMPORTANT POINT AND I DO WANT TO HEAR ABOUT IT, PLEASE.

Coretta Scott King:

For instance, in Birmingham, we had a federal injunction, and see, it had, it began to be a strategy of the opposition to stop the movement. They started in Albany, and it caught us off guard. So in Birmingham, when the federal injunction was placed, Albany had become a learning ground, and Martin had decided that he was going to go against that federal injunction and go on to jail, and take that risk and whatever, come whatever, but we had in Birmingham a different situation. We had a more inhumane and brutal police force and what they were able to do was arouse the conscience of the nation in support of the demonstrators because they brought out the fire hoses and the dogs, and all of that. And because of that, Martin began to, to have the moral authority on his side and he went to jail in, in Birmingham, despite the fact that there was a federal injunction. He broke it. The fact is that he had to serve time, even in 1967, as late as December 1967, he had to go back to Birmingham and serve five days, because of that—that he broke that law. He went willingly. But the fact is, that, if people don't understand that, they—they talk about all other kinds of reasons, why Albany didn't work. Albany didn't work because it was a new tactic that had come and I'm not sure the opposition even realized it fully. But Martin began to realize it, because he kept hoping and pleading to Burke Marshall. I heard him on the telephone, saying, "We need some help down here." You know, he said, "We've got to have a victory in order to keep, you know, people in the movement inspired." And, and, and so the only thing they could do, then, was to try to fill up the jails. When we all decided to go to jail, and the wives were going to march—I was going to lead it, along with Jean Young, and Juanita Abernathy, and others—they decided to let Martin and Ralph out of jail. And that sort of took the steam out of what we were doing. I mean, they were very clever. And the others were not as smart as that in many of the other places.

QUESTION 33
INTERVIEWER:

NOW YOU HAD A BABY FOUR DAYS BEFORE DR. KING HEADED OUT FOR BIRMINGHAM, FOR THE BIRMINGHAM CAMPAIGN. WAS THAT HARD, WAS THAT A PARTICULARLY HARD TIME FOR YOU?

Coretta Scott King:

Birmingham was a very difficult time. I had by that time, my last baby, four children. We were waiting for the baby to come so Martin could go to jail, but the movement had already started. A lot of people had already been arrested. So—

QUESTION 34
INTERVIEWER:

I'M SORRY THAT REALLY DID GO VERY FAST THAT ROLL.

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

That was a roll-out on 194. We're going to 195.

QUESTION 35
INTERVIEWER:

—OF HOW YOU FELT, WAS BIRM—HIS GOING OFF TO BIRMINGHAM, DID THAT SEEM A PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS TIME?

Coretta Scott King:

Birmingham was very difficult for many reasons, from a personal standpoint. Basically, I was in a situation with four children, Martin was in jail. I did not even have regular household help. I had temporary volunteer help and four children and my husband in jail and it was—it was really a problem here in Atlanta, because in Montgomery I had, we had gone through a struggle together, and even though this was home, people didn't react the same way. It was, everybody was preoccupied with Montgomery. I mean, it was, it was a way of life. I mean for a whole year we boycotted—more than a year—the buses, before the desegregation took place. So in Montgomery, here we were, in a situation, soon after we arrived, and there was not much help coming forth from people just...we had a volunteer church member, to help, and that was difficult for me. The difficulty of understanding what was going to happen, I knew that, I was prepared for it.

QUESTION 36
INTERVIEWER:

THIS IS BIRMINGHAM? I'M SORRY, COULD YOU, COULD YOU FOCUS BACK TO…

Coretta Scott King:

I was prepared for Birmingham. I was prepared for that, because we had waited for the baby to come, and, so Martin could go to jail in Birmingham. Birmingham was the best planned campaign we had ever had, and so it worked very well, ‘cause it was planned quite well. Although the situation in Birmingham, and the segregation there was, was so intense, Martin felt that it was the most segregated city, second to Johannesburg, South Africa, in the world. And he understood that it was going to be, the opposition was going to be tough there. But we were prepared for that. But he wanted to fill the jails, and that's what happened. But what really bothered me, most, was when he went to jail on Good Friday, they did not allow him to make a phone call. And I always got a phone call from him once he went to jail, so I felt better hearing from him. Friday passed, Saturday, Sunday, no call. And that's when I called Wyatt Walker, on Easter Sunday, and asked him if he thought it would help if I made a statement to the press on the way they were being treated. They were being held incommunicado, and that, to say that I was concerned about his safety, because when you don't hear from people, you don't even know what's going on, in jail. And Wyatt said, "I don't—I think what you should do is to call the President." And I said, "You think he'd talk to me?" He said, "Of course, he'd have to." And so I said, "Well, OK, I guess I'll do that, but could you send a note in to Martin. See if you can get a note in, and ask him, tell him what we're trying to do, and get his, his opinion on it." ‘Cause I wouldn't want to do anything to interfere, you know, and he tried all day long, and about night he called, and he said, "They're not even letting the lawyers in now." And he said, "I don't think you have any choice now but to call." So I proceeded to call, and finally you know, I got no response, because I didn't know how to do it. Finally, I said to the operator, she kept saying, "We have no listing for the President, anyone in his family, not for the Vice President." And I said, "There must be someone who can get me to the President." And she says, "What about Pierre Salinger?" And I said, "Oh sure, I don't know why I didn't think about that." And Pierre Salinger was right there on the phone when she called, placed the call, and he said, "Oh sure, Mrs. King, I'll tell the President." I said "I wanted to see him. I wanted to talk to him, rather." Well, the President didn't call right away, but Bobby Kennedy called, the Attorney General, that evening. And he wanted to know what he could do to help, and he complained about the situation in Birmingham, and officials, and how difficult it was, but it would be better after the election took place. But they were going to be sending the FBI in, and that they would check on my husband, and so on. Well, the next day about six o'clock, I got this call from President Kennedy, and when I got the call, of course, I did not realize he was on the phone, because the call was answered downstairs by my housekeeper, the person who was with me. It wasn't my housekeeper, because she wasn't regular, a regular person. It was my temporary help.

QUESTION 37
INTERVIEWER:

ACTUALLY, MAYBE YOU SHOULD START THAT AGAIN, YOU GOT SIDETRACKED. YOU CAN JUST SAY THE CALL WAS ANSWERED DOWNSTAIRS.

Coretta Scott King:

Oh, and so I got a call, and the call came in downstairs, and when I came onto the call the operator was saying, "Will you get your child off the phone, please," and so, little Dexter was there babbling away on the phone, and I yelled down to say, "Get Dexter off the phone," and then this voice came on, and I knew it was a familiar voice. And he said, "Mrs. King, I—how are you? I got your message and I understand you talked to my brother, and he, did he explain to you we sent the FBI in last night to check on your husband and he, he is all right? I want you to know that we are doing everything we can and Dr. King is, is, is safe, and if there's anything that I can do, in the next few days to be of help, feel free to call on me. You know how to get me, don't you? You get in touch with me, or my brother, or Pierre. You know how to get me, don't you?" And I said, "Yes, Mr. President, thank you so much." He said, "And by the way, your husband will be calling you very shortly." And it was such a relief, in about fifteen minutes, Martin called. And of course, he fasted when he went to jail, and he was really, you could tell he was very kind of down, with no energy. And when he spoke of course, he was very glad to speak to me, but he didn't know why he was calling. And of course, I tried to convey it to him without saying every word because we knew we were being wiretapped. And so he got, sent back to me to get the message through to Wyatt Walker, and you know, get the press, you know, we had to use the press to keep, get the word out. And Martin said after that they were, as a matter of fact, they had been sleeping on steel, they gave him mattresses, and pillows, and got them out for exercise, and showers, and so forth. I mean, the treatment changed markedly. And it was because of that intervention. Well, you know, after that, I felt much better, and of course I was able to go and visit Martin that week, and, and of course I felt better after I knew he was in communication, that someone could reach him. As long as he was safe, I didn't worry about what he was doing, because I supported it, and I believed, I knew it had to be done. And he very much wanted to do this, to identify with the life, the life of Christ, going to jail on Good Friday. And it was a very, very emotional thing with the staff, I understand, when he was trying to make his decision. Because if he went to jail, broke the injunction, what would happen if the movement stopped, or if it continued, or how, you know, all that he had to make a decision on. He was trying to get Ralph to go with him. Ralph said, I need to be in my pulpit, Easter Sunday. You have Daddy King and you don't have to be there. And he said, Ralph, you've always been with me, but I'm going, and Ralph joined him.

QUESTION 38
INTERVIEWER:

HE WAS WONDERFUL IN OUR INTERVIEW WITH HIM. HE WAS QUITE WONDERFUL. LET ME JUMP TO SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS AT THE END OF THE, REALLY AFTER THE CAMPAIGN, WHICH IS THE, THE BOMBING OF THE SIXTEENTH STREET CHURCH, WHEN THE FOUR LITTLE GIRLS WERE KILLED. DO YOU REMEMBER YOUR REACTION TO THAT?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, I was shocked, really, because it was right after the March on Washington in 1963, which was such a great experience. It was a great moment of fulfillment, when Martin gave his "I Have a Dream speech," and we really felt that sense of progress. That people came together, black and white. Even though the South was totally segregated, but here black and white people were there together. And we felt that, felt that sense of oneness. And we, we just, you know, had the feeling that, you know, the dream could be realized. And then a few weeks later, this bombing in Birmingham with four innocent little girls. And then you realized how intense this whole feeling was, and the opposition was, and that it would take a lot more than what was being done, to change the situation. In a sense it was, it was just one of those things. What could you say? I mean, these are innocent children, in a Sunday School. I mean, you know, the person, you think about the, the human being that did this. But I think it was those young girls were martyrs, were martyrs for the cause. And whenever you have martyrs, it tends to—it advances the cause. I think that in Birmingham, in this Birmingham story and the achievement of the settlement that led to the Civil Rights Act, John F. Kennedy, too, became a martyr, because in the fall, November, as a matter of fact, 22nd, he was assassinated in that same year. And with the four little girls, and John F. Kennedy, President Johnson was able to get the Civil Rights Act passed, I think, in 1964, in July because it became a memorial to, to President Kennedy. I understand that was part of the technique that was used to get the bill through the Congress.

QUESTION 39
INTERVIEWER:

STOP FOR A MOMENT. YOU'RE HAVING A—READY WHEN YOU ARE. WE'LL TELL THE STORY UP ‘TIL THAT POINT IF YOU, IF YOU'D LIKE TO JUST…

Coretta Scott King:

When I arrived in Selma, and went to the church where the meeting was being held, it was a noontime mass meeting, Andy Young said to me, "Malcolm X is here, and he just made a speech, and he has really aroused the people, and you're going to have to speak, because you're going to have to, really, talk about nonviolence and sort of invoke you know, the whole nonviolent spirit, because the people now have been turned a different way." And I said, "Andy, I don't feel like speaking. I really don't want to speak." He said, "But you're going to have to speak." And I was there to visit Martin, who was in jail, really. And so he finally kept saying, "Well, you know, you really got to do it, and I, we just need it." So I said "Well, OK, for the cause, you know, I'll do it." Though it wasn't that inspired, myself. Well, you know, when you get into a situation with an audience, and people who have that spirit, you know, you kind of get some spirit yourself. And as I was sitting on the platform, Malcolm X leaned over toward me, 'cause we sat next to each other, and he said, "Mrs. King, will you tell Dr. King that I'm sorry I won't get to see him. I had planned to visit him in jail, but I have to leave. I have to go out of the country" to I believe he said France or England, to an all-Africa conference. "But I want him to know, you tell him that, that I didn't come to make his job more difficult. I thought that if the white people understood what the alternative was, that they would be willing to listen to Dr. King." Well, I didn't quite know how to take it because, prior to that, I had my own perception of Malcolm. And I, you know, I, I thought of him as being a really violent-type person. I mean, you know, but he was so meek, and he was, he was so different, you know, as most people are, when you get to know them, when you confront them. And so I said "Well, thank you very much. I'll be sure and tell him." And of course, within a few weeks, Malcolm had been assassinated. And it made a tremendous impact on me, because I kept thinking what a, what a waste. He had, he had begun to turn around, after having gone to Mecca and understanding what true Islam is.

QUESTION 40
INTERVIEWER:

I'M GOING TO MOVE YOU AHEAD, ALSO, NOW TO THAT KEY SUNDAY, BLOODY SUNDAY, IN SELMA. I'M WONDERING, HOW DID DR. KING REACT TO THE NEWS? HE WASN'T IN TOWN, BECAUSE HE WAS IN ATLANTA DOING OTHER WORK, BUT WHAT WAS HIS REACTION TO THAT?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, whenever there was violence of any kind, it was depressing to Martin. Because he understood the potential of, of, of destroying community, destroying life, and unnecessary life, it, it is not controlled, and if it's not stopped, really. And what he wanted to do was to try to find a way to turn this into, to a nonviolent struggle. A struggle had to be but it must be nonviolent. The violence came from the opposition. But when I talked to him that evening, and I was out in San Francisco when he, when he, when he called. I called him and he seemed so depressed. I said to him, and I was trying to think of something to cheer him, that if you have all those people to come in, as he was mobilizing people to come in, I think it was for Tuesday, and this was Sunday night, then you can, you know, write your own law, so to speak. There was an injunction against marching, the same kind of thing that had been tried in Birmingham, and we had, the people already having been hurt, and so on. And it was just dangerous to try to do this, unless we could get the federal, the National Guard federalized. And this is what he was asking the President to do, to federalize the National Guard. The troops were already there. And they were the Alabama National Guard. And what he wanted to do was to federalize them. And so that's what he was hoping and asking for. But it was a very difficult time for him and for, for me too, because I felt torn. Since I wasn't, I wasn't in Atlanta, and I wanted to rush back. I was out west, trying to raise money through my Freedom Concerts, performances, and, and I said to Martin, "I'll come back." And he said, "No, you don't need to come back. You stay, because you're making a contribution too." But I knew what I would do. If anything happened, I was going to take that first plane out. But fortunately, I didn't have to do that, but, but Selma was, in many ways very rewarding, but in many ways very frustrating too.

QUESTION 41
INTERVIEWER:

BUT LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT ONE OF THE REWARDS OF IT, ALL RIGHT? ONE OF THE THINGS YOU MUST HAVE FELT GOOD ABOUT IS, PRESIDENT JOHNSON CALLING FOR…

Coretta Scott King:

Oh, I did. When I, I was, I was alone in my bedroom when President Johnson gave that speech, the "We Shall Overcome speech," is what we call it, and I was talking to the television. I kept saying, "They finally got the message. They finally got the message." And I was saying, "Oh, this is great. This is great." Then he would say, "We shall overcome, and we shall overcome." And I just, you know, I had nobody to talk to because I was alone. The kids—I think the kids might have been asleep—but you know, here I was, in my bedroom, just feeling such a great thrill. You know, to have the President, you know, saying these things, which I thought the whole nation would somehow begin to feel. And I think that did happen. that was a great moment for us.

QUESTION 42
INTERVIEWER:

WE'VE HEARD A STORY THAT, THAT DR. KING'S REACTION WAS THAT HE CRIED. DO YOU, DO YOU KNOW WHETHER THAT'S TRUE?

Coretta Scott King:

Well, I wasn't with him, so I really don't know. He was not in, in Atlanta, so I really, I really don't know. He could have. He cried occasionally. You know, you cry with, with moments of fulfillment and joy, and you cry, moments of sadness and sometimes you cry when you just, you know, have so much pressure and you've got to release it. You know?

QUESTION 43
INTERVIEWER:

NOW LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT ONE OF THE SAD MOMENTS, THEN, WHICH IS, THE STEPS OF THE CAPITOL AFTER THAT FINAL MARCH, AND AFTER THE DEATHS OF, AFTER THE DEATH OF JIMMY LEE JACKSON, TOO, I MEAN, HOW DID YOU FEEL? DID IT FEEL LIKE A TRIUMPH TO HAVE MADE IT THROUGH THIS MARCH, OR DID IT, DID IT FEEL [unintelligible] DID IT FEEL VERY, VERY SAD?

Coretta Scott King:

It was a great, it was a great moment to go back to Montgomery, ‘cause you see for us it was returning to Montgomery after ten years. And I kept thinking about ten years earlier, how we were visibly just blacks, and when you looked at that march, you had Catholic priests, and nuns, and you had other clergy, and you had a lot of white people. ** I mean, you know, it was really a beautiful thing to pass Dexter Avenue ** and pass, and go toward the capitol marching together, ** even though it was a dangerous march. I mean, we never felt that we were safe at any point. Even coming into Montgomery that day, into the city, because they had guard, national, federal guardsman on buildings and all around, and as we came through certain sections, the staff people surrounded Martin and even held up their hands around his head, to make sure that if there was a bullet, that you know, it would be deflected. So, I mean, it was not easy and there were threats of plots of his assassination all the way through that march. So you know, though when we got down to Dexter and going up toward the capitol, it was safer. And there was a great feeling of exhilaration when you looked back and saw, you know, what we thought was 50,000, at least, a lot of entertainment personalities and so on. It, it was a great moment of fulfillment, having done that, and listening to Martin's speech ** that day, and he ended it with the Glory, Hallelujah, which was you know, used at the last speech he made. But he had asked me to write out the words to that, "Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory," and certain verses that he didn't remember. And he ended that speech that day with that same, quoting that same song, "Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory of the Battle."

CAMERA CREW MEMBER:

Eyes on the Prize. Interview with Mrs. Coretta Scott King. Sound roll 1148. Camera roll 197. Continuation of interview. Reference tone.

QUESTION 44
INTERVIEWER:

SO, WHAT WOULD YOU SAY WERE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN THAT TEN-YEAR PERIOD AND WHAT WAS LEFT UNDONE?

Coretta Scott King:

I think the sense of dignity that black people had achieved and the feeling that they had now a place in our society and, and they could be represented, because they had not yet registered the large number of people, but at least we had the ballot had been achieved, desegregation of public transportation, desegregation of public accommodations, and of course, we had, in a sense, we had desegregated the, the South, in many, essentially, in terms of the batteries, physically, that separated us. But the implementation of all of this had yet to be realized. The—there was also the lack of economic progress. I mean, with…with the barriers of segregation being eliminated, so to speak, legally, all the legal barriers were, had been eliminated, but there were these other barriers that would, would still keep people in a, in a form of oppression and to a disadvantage, unless something took place there. So Martin knew that at some point he had to deal with that. But we were confronted with a war: the Vietnam War. So he had to deal with that issue, and he spoke out, of course, on the Vietnam War, and then, because of the reaction, he sort of retreated a bit. Because people were not ready to continue to support him in that and support civil rights. But then, of course, in 1967, he began his campaign for economic justice, and that is what he understood was the final and great challenge, and that it would require much more from all of us. And he said, this is going to be the most difficult aspect of our whole struggle.

QUESTION 45
INTERVIEWER:

PLEASE EXCUSE ME, THAT'S THE END OF OUR TIME PERIOD. I CAN'T, I CAN'T QUITE, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IF THERE'S ANYTHING FOR THE PERIOD THAT ENDS IN'65 THAT WE SHOULD KNOW THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE A CHANCE TO SAY THAT.

Coretta Scott King:

OK, you just want to keep i …

QUESTION 46
INTERVIEWER:

BECAUSE WE, WE'RE, WE WON'T BE ABLE TO GO PAST '65 IN THIS PROGRAM. WE'RE …

Coretta Scott King:

You asked me what still needed to be achieved, so that was what I was trying to do. Now what, what, what do you want me to do?

QUESTION 47
INTERVIEWER:

ANY OTHER ACCOMPLISHMENTS THAT YOU THINK WE SHOULD KNOW. ANYTHING ELSE. THE DIGNITY IS VERY IMPORTANT. DO YOU THINK—AND THE BREAKING OF THE BARRIERS—STOP FOR A MOMENT. THIS WAS A PERIOD WHERE, WHERE PEOPLE WERE REALLY RAISING THEIR ASPIRATIONS AND THEN THEY COULD MOVE FORWARD, I THINK THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT, PLEASE.

Coretta Scott King:

This was a period where the aspirations of those who had been disadvantaged, black and poor people, had been raised. There was a lot of hope, and there was a great feeling now, that we have been able to make progress and change, within a relatively short period of time. So much progress, that we can with hard work and determination continue to move forward, and particularly if we remain nonviolent. I think that was what Martin kept saying, use of the nonviolent strategy was a formula that would, would help us move, I think, on toward the realization of, of equality and equity.

QUESTION 48
INTERVIEWER:

THAT'S A WONDERFUL ANSWER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT'S A WRAP.