Interview with Russell Oswald
Interview with Russell Oswald

Interviewer: Sheila Bernard
Production Team: B

Interview Date: February 24, 1989

Camera Rolls: 2098-2102
Sound Rolls: 245-246

Interview gathered as part of Eyes on the Prize II: America at the Racial Crossroads 1965 to 1985,
Produced by Blackside, Inc.
Housed at the Washington University Film and Media Archive, Henry Hampton Collection.
Editorial Notes:

Preferred citation:
Interview with Russell Oswald, conducted by Blackside, Inc. on February 24, 1989, for Eyes on the Prize II: America at the Racial Crossroads 1965 to 1985. Washington University Libraries, Film and Media Archive, Henry Hampton Collection.

These transcripts contain material that did not appear in the final program. Only text appearing in bold italics was used in the final version of Eyes on the Prize.

INTERVIEW


QUESTION 1
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Ok, can you describe for me, the new kind of prison movement that had developed at San Quinten, in the 1960s, what was going on in Prisons?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well there were, there were attempts made to develop them more along treatment lines, rather than strictly custody, but it of course, it was a long hall, because you had to change so many things, and you had to get so much more money to do a real treatment job, rather just keeping people in custody.

QUESTION 2
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

What was going on in terms of prisoner up risinging--there had been trouble at, at Folsom Prison and Auburn. What was going on in terms of prisoners.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, they were, ah, the represented--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

I'm story if you could--if you could tell me the prisoners--

RUSSELL OSWALD:

If you could tell me?

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

No, I need to tell me in terms of "the prisoners represented."

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Oh, The prisoner's represented what was, ah, really in our larger society. There was, ah, ah, terrible rebellious attitude, in the late 1960s, as you might recall, the ah, Kent State and ah the Chicago Seven, and the ah, the the difficulties at Folsom prison with George Jackson. And everyone was rebellious, it was a mini rebellion. So different from the days that we have today, or the, in the ear--in 1970.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Ok Cut.


QUESTION 3
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

The prison situation in your words "went critical" when George Jackson was killed. Can you talk about his death, and about your response when the prisoner's held their memorial to him?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, I felt that, ah, when--after Jackso--George Jackson's death.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

I'm sorry, can I--you begin with saying "After George Jackson's death."

RUSSELL OSWALD:

After George Jackson death, several of the institutions wanted to put on memorials and we exceeded to that. We however, felt that ah, it was just the start to more trouble in the institutions. Because he was far from being an untroubled individual: he had troubles of his own, and all of these people liked to mimic him. As a matter of fact, many of them, ah, were using all of his rhetoric, and they subsequently used the rhetoric from all of the demands that were made in San Quinten and Folsom, to ship to New York state prisons and to other places.

QUESTION 4
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If I'm a 16 year old viewer and I've never heard of George Jackson, can you describe who George Jackson was from your point of view as a prison official? Who was George Jackson and what was he saying in your mind, to the prisoners at Attica?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well I think George Jackson was a, a, a individual who was alienated. He, he was typical of those times and times such as now, when when, African Americans felt that they weren't getting and even shake, and he was bitter about that and he wanted to change things, and certainly I, agreed with that, I agreed with from the beginning of time, that much had to be done to make situations better for not only African Americans but for Hispanics, and for so many other people, who are just as disadvantaged, either financially or through hereditary or any number of reasons. And so I thought it was alright to have some celebration for him. Some, not celebration, but some feelings for him.

QUESTION 5
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

And, but when George Jackson was killed, he became a sort of a martyr to the inmates at Attica, and the next day they filed into the cafeteria and in--was that organized, can you tell me what happened?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well I'm reasonably sure it was organized, but ah, ah I don't know that much about it, ah, but um, some other things organized--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Ok, can we cut for a second.


QUESTION 6
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

The Morning that Attica was taken, by the prisoners, and you got the call to come to the facility, you arrived at the prison, and you're facing two basic choices, either to storm the prison with with force you had, or to negotiate. Can you tell me what was going through your mind at the time, how you were going to make that decision, and what happened? Just describe the situation for me.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well when I arrived at Attica, I ah, had some feelings about what was going on, I read from, in the plane, from Albany, to Attica many many letter from prisoners who had written me after I had been at Attica the week before and outlined the things I wanted to do for them. And they were commendatory letters. And I found it difficult to understand what suddenly had happened to change this whole situation. I knew that I had to make a decision, very quickly. I knew what the standards were of the American Correctional Association, in terms of dealing with prisons that are being taken over by prisoners. Because my deputy, had both worked on the books for the American Correctional Association that said, "you don't ever give in to inmates, you have to take the prison back." However, I felt that, ah, since there was a delay, in retaking that prison, because the state police and the correction department didn't have enough people to take over the whole institution, they they, delayed further efforts until I got there. And, shortly after I got there, there was enough state police ah, troopers to retake the prison, but I felt that I wanted to ah, try, something other than bloodshed retaking of the prison, and I was iconoclastic to say that I can do it. And I felt that I had previously dealt with situations, not as serious as this, but in many other states that I'd been commissioner in. And in every instance I had been able to win them over, and avoid bloodshed.

QUESTION 7
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you describe for me the gravity of the situation that, in terms of the hostages, in terms of how many people were now in D Yard. What, how grave was the situation you were facing?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

It was very grave, there were over a thousand people in the yard. There were some 43 hostages, many had been battered and beaten badly, and ah, there was a sense of euphoria, everyone was jubilant, they thought they had the thing won. And, ah, they were going to show the state and the commissioner, and the governor, and everyone else that this had to change. And I wanted it to change.

QUESTION 8
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

When the prisoners refused to meet you on neutral ground, you then faced the decision whether to go into D Yard or not, can you talk about, about your decision and about the fact that people like Dunbar and Mancusi were saying not to go in, what was? Can you describe that?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Yes, ah, when I elected to go into the institution alone, ah, I was counseled, by all of my lieutenants not to do that, that it was a foolhardy effort, I said I have to take that step, I can't live with myself unless I go in and try, and I'll try and convince them that I mean business, that I want to do things that I told them I was going to do last week.

QUESTION 9
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you, can you just explain the situation a little more fully, in terms of you're trying to save the hostages' lives, you've decided to do it by negotiating, and I'm not exactly following why, what was it that was preventing you from storming in, were you afraid that if you stormed the prisoners the hostages would be killed? Or that by negotiating, you could... I'm not sure that I'm following that.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, what I was trying to avoid was having anyone killed. I--naturally I was tremendously concerned with the hostages. But I was also concerned with the many prisoners, and many of them were there of their own accord: they were swept in with the whole ah, retaking of the prison, they had no choice, and a lot of them stayed out, wouldn't go in. So that I was more--I was interested in both. The hostages and the prisoners.

QUESTION 10
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

So if you could just tell me again, as you're going into D yard, what are you hoping to accomplish and what are you--and as you're walking into yard what are you facing?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, I am, am, ah, facing a very hostile group, but I--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

I'm sorry but if you could just give a couple of--as you

RUSSELL OSWALD:

As I walked into the yard--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

I just talked so you have to do it one more time.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

As I walked into the yard, I knew I was facing a very hostile group, on the other hand, I knew that there were a lot of people, undoubtedly in there who believed in what I wanted to do for them. And if, what they had in mind--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Oh, sorry cut.



QUESTION 11
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

inmate?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

I decided to go into D yard for, ah, humanitarian reasons. I knew that the hostages were in a very difficult situation. They had been beaten, I knew that. I knew that they were harassed. I also felt that to do otherwise than to go in there would leave me with one option that was to go in armed. And there would be ah unfavorable consequences. Ah people would be killed, invariably. So I decided that I could do better going in there and trying to talk them into reasonableness. That was my hope. Unfortunately it didn't turn out just the way I hoped it would.

QUESTION 12
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

So describe it for me. What was it like? What did it look like? What were people doing?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well first I saw the hostages. I had a chance to look at them. And they were badly beaten and they had ah cloths over their eyes ah blinding them, you know. And ah ah they were cowed, ah they had been beaten bas... so badly. And the ah prisoners, ah the leaders, were up on the stand looking down on me. And ah...ah they were trying to humiliate me any way they could that ah they were asking for certain things and they wanted those or there would be people killed. I talked as rationally as I could with them. And ah listened to them for some period of time. And ultimately ah they said they had an agenda of what they wanted. And I said well give me the agenda.** And they did. They said ah, what can you do about that? Can you give us all these things? I said I'd have to study them. And they said well ah when do you want to study them? I said as soon as you're through with me I'll go out and study them, which is what I did.

QUESTION 13
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

How would you characterize the rebel leadership? Were these people interested in prison reform? Was this Black power? What were the leaders like? People like Richard Clark and Herb Blyden, did they represent the prisoners?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well I think that they represented ah, ah--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could just tell me you're talking about.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Ah you asked me about, no, I'm ah, I noticed that ah...ah Clark and Blyden seemed to be leaders among their group. There were others, however, Sam Melville was there, Jerry Rosenberg was there, ah Butler was there. Ah a number of them. However, Clark and Blyden seemed to be the leaders. They...they sounded like they were fairly intelligent people and one wondered how they could think that they could control the whole state government and...and change everything through violence. However they...they undoubtedly felt that they could do it that way.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Ok, Cut please. I may be asking you the wrong--


QUESTION 14
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could just ask the person in charge of this prison and the other prisons in the state, characterize, what's going on here? Who's leading this rebellion and is it, what is it? What's going on?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

The people leading this rebellion as others around the country, were definitely a revolutionary group. Ah which was not unlike what was going on on the outside in terms of rebellion. The Vietnam War and so on. Ah this group at Attica ah were all enrolled in a civics class and they...they met daily for class. But that class I later learned out was controlled by a revolutionary group and they were constantly talking revolution. Day after day after day. And undoubtedly they...they finally fought--found, or thought, that they would be able to take over this institution.

QUESTION 15
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

So if someone said well Attica was just a spontaneous prisoner uprising against conditions, what would your response be?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

If someone asked me if that was a spontaneous revolution, taking over that institution, I would have to say, as I said many times before, it was planned. It was not spontaneous. And I have very good evidence for that. Ah number one, the day before, when two men got in ah...ah little fisticuff affair, ah a lieutenant split the two up and the one purposely struck the lieutenant. Now this is not done in prisons. And very very serious thing for a prisoner to do that. It was obviously planned they'd do that. They were subsequently put in keep lock, these two men. And that night every one in the institution was saying ah they are going to be beaten. And in the morning, the next morning, the people weren't going to breakfast. And some of them ah were not able to go to breakfast. They were keep-locked. So ah the thing was set up, an additional factor which makes me know that it wasn't spontaneous, is that one of the individuals, a prisoner, who wrote me often and was probably one of the brightest individuals in that prison and who did some work for the ah leadership, arranged to put himself in the hospital the night before the institution was taken over.

QUESTION 16
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Did you feel, as you were hearing the demands, did you feel that they were reasonable? They were simply demands for prison reform?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Yes. Ah when I heard the demands that they made, I looked at them quickly. And I said, what are they doing? Are they taking my agenda? It was almost exactly the same things I talked with them on...on ah the radio the day before, or the week before. And I found no big difficulty with most of those demands of theirs. So that I felt well we're home free now. Because if I say that I'm going to do these things, ah they ought to, ah agree to release the hostages.

QUESTION 17
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

By the third time you went into D yard, which was Friday around noon, everything was different, the mood was very different. Can you tell me about that?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well ah they ah, by Friday noon, when I went in the third time, ah it seemed to me that they were feeling much differently. They...they had a feeling that I wasn't going to give them the things that they had asked for. And the fact of the matter is I was going to give them 29 of the 32 demands. There were three demands I said I couldn't give them. One, was amnesty for ah capital crimes.

QUESTION 18
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Let me inter--why couldn't you give them amnesty?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well how can you give amnesty for the killing of a person? No one can.

QUESTION 19
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Amnesty was refused before. What was it about amnesty that, even before William Kline was dead?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, yeah but ah amnesty ah, I gave them ah complete amnesty for ah any of the property damage they performed. But I couldn't give them that for...for, in case anyone was killed, before we even knew that Kline was killed.

QUESTION 20
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

And why?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well because I...I wouldn't ever think of giving amn...amnesty for a capital crime. Neither would the governor. Neither would most people.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Okay. Cut please.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Oh if he's guilty, you can't grant amnesty. That's what I'm saying.



QUESTION 21
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

What led you to decide that the third time you went into D Yard that it would be the last time that you should go?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, they were, when I went into the institution for the third time, ah, I was in there for, I think over an hour and a half. And, ah, there was a different mood. They, ah, seemed to be more bitter and more demanding and, ah, ah, one of the prisoners began yelling that instead of releasing me they should hang me in the yard on this occasion. And that they ought not to let me out. And that picked up. There was a chant, "Hang Oswald" and so on. And, ah, ah, I then felt that I had to talk my way out of it. I told them that they were ill advised to think of anything like that. That I was more help to them alive than dead. And that they ought to give serious thought to that. Well, they talked for some time and the leaders said, don't be worried like that but meanwhile, they were still yelling, hang me. Ah, finally, they gave the assignment to Big Smith who was, ah, big, husky fellow. And, ah, he led a troop of, of prisoners. And they said, just relax now for a few minutes and he'll get you out of here. And, in 10 or 15 minutes, they got a group of prisoners together and provided a guard for me to get out.

QUESTION 22
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you tell me about Saturday, that was Friday and all Friday night, the observer committee starts to assemble. And they worked all night with the prisoners and came up with an expanded list of 28 demands, not including the three immediate demands which were non negotiable. Can you tell about hammering--that session with the observers committee, when your hammering, through and reaching that agreement How did you feel? Were you hopeful?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

I was ho--hopeful because we seemed to be agreeing, ah, as.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Could you just start by telling me about the observer committee.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Ah, on Friday night, with the Observer Committee, we began trying to ham.. hammer out these demands of theirs and, and refine them. And, it was encouraging to me to get all the help that I did from many of the observers. For instance, ah, Mr. Kuntsler was very help, helpful in, ah, working out the demands. And, ah, ah, several of them were, ah, Mr. Gasher and others. And, ah, with, ah, my deputy and I working with them, we thought we were able to ham.. hammer out, ah, satisfactory set of demands. And we, we did.

QUESTION 23
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

And when you presented, when you called the Governor and told him about the 28 demands. If you could just tell me about what you sense was of the demands that you could agree to them and the Governor's response.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

I, afterwards called the Governor and told him that we had worked out, ah, this agenda, ah, that, ah, ah, Mr. Dunbar and I both felt that this was reasonable and the direction we had been wanting to go for a long time and the question now was, even during the big financial difficulty that was in the State was in at that time, did he feel that he was able to help us attain those, those goals that we put in the demands. And he said, Yes, he would definitely work hard with the legislature to get the money. And, he agreed with me, that these demands seemed alright and he approved.

QUESTION 24
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could, in your book you describe that this feeling of unity, was a high point in the Attica thing, that people were working together and that you actually felt jubilant at that point. Is that an accurate?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

No, I, I, I felt, ah, after this work on the set of demands, that we were coming together a little better. But, ah, what I didn't realize was that there were dissidents who were not with the observers that we worked with when we worked out this, this agenda. Ah, there were many dissident people who were real troublesome and, and the sort of persons that I shouldn't have, ah, permitted to be on the Observer Committee in the beginning.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you give me more information. I'm not following what you're talking about.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, I'm not going to name names. But there were a number of people on the Observer's Committee who were so partisan that they couldn't be observe, objective observers about anything. And they were just there to foment trouble. And those are the ones I'm talking about.

QUESTION 25
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you recall much about your conversation with William Kuntsler about letting Bobby Seale come? What was your sense of whether it would be a good idea to bring him or not?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, I think, ah, Mr. Kuntsler suggested that, ah, ah, that he, that Bobby Seale should be brought there, brought to the institution. And I think Arthur E.. Eve did too. And after thinking about it a very short time I felt that it was worthwhile. That, ah, he was important, from the West Coast, in this movement and that if he came and saw what the situation was and what we were willing to do that if he agreed with us, he might be persuasive in helping us get this thing settled.

QUESTION 26
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

And what happened?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, when he first arrived at the institution...

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could just start with Bobby Seale.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

When Bobby Seale first arrived at the institution, ah, the men at the gates would not let him in. And, ah, he got in his car, whoever was driving them, and they left the institution. Ah, someone telephoned me then that this had happened. And he had been told that he might be arrested for being in that area because of a curfew in the Buffalo area for felons being on the street at night. And, ah, I sent world to stop him, ah, so the State Police stopped his car and brought him back to the institution.

QUESTION 27
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Okay. I'm sorry I wasn't specific enough? When he went into the yard?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

He's not there yet.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

I'm jumping ahead. And it was pretty clear that he wasn't going to push for these demands. Can you jump, when he's in the yard.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

And start from there?

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

And just start from there, after he got into the yard. Was he helpful as you had hoped?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Ah, after Bobby Seale was admitted to the institution and went into the yard, he was of no help at all. He said he could understand their problems and he would try to help them. But he would have to go back and talk with some of the leaders of his movement. And he stayed a very short time and left. And, ah, was no, of no help at all.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Could we cut for a second?



QUESTION 28
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

By Sunday, it was pretty clear to you that the inmates were not going to pay attention to these 28 demands because they were focusing on the other three. And the observers had a new recommendation that Governor Rockefeller should come to the prison. Did you join in that recommendation and can you tell me why?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

The, ah, Observers Committee, by Sunday, began to realize that, ah, the prisoners apparently were not going to accept the 28, ah, answers to their demands, which were affirmative. They felt that, ah, ah, they needed to get some commitment from the Governor that, he would either come to the institution, or he would grant amnesty for any crimes that might have been committed. Ah, they got in touch with District Attorney James and, ah, ah, a group of the, ah, observers, I've forgotten who was all included, but I know Tom Wicker was one of them and Senator Dunn and there was a third. They talked with him at length and he spent a lot of time talking with them but he gave them no answer that was satisfactory with them. In, previously before they talked to the Governor, they talked with District Attorney James who also assured them he would give them no, no, ah, answer on amnesty that he would have to prosecute. So that at that point they, they felt that they were getting nowhere, not with the Governor, not with District Attorney James and certainly not with me, at that point.

QUESTION 29
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

But at that point didn't--



QUESTION 30
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

So, if you could tell me about the observers recommending that Governor Rockefeller come to Attica.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Ah, the ob.. observers decided that they had to make an effort to get Governor Rockefeller to come to Attica. They, ah, had failed and so they wanted us to contact the Governor and get him to come. Ah, they asked Bobby Douglas who was his chief assistant to get in touch with him and see if he could get Gove--the Governor to come to Attica. Ah, we got him on the phone. First, Bob Douglas talked with him, for some time and then hung up. And he came back and told me that the Governor was, didn't feel he should come. And, I was to go back and tell the Observers Committee. But I said, "Bob, I would just as soon if you would tell them that." But, in any event, we both told them that. And, they then asked us to get in touch with him again. So, I talked with him at great length and, ah, ah, the General talked with him. And two or three other people, Senator Dunn talked with him. And he finally asked me, "Russell, what is your true feeling? Can I help by coming?" I said, "Well, I think that your public image would be improved if you came. But I, I am sincere in feeling that it's not going to change anything because they'll insist that you come into the yard to talk with them. They will not meet you anywhere else. I'm certain of that because they wouldn't meet any of us anytime anytime place else. I often offered them an opportunity for safe passage to a separate cell block to meet with me alone. They wouldn't do that." And so, he said, "Well, I really don't believe I can do any good." He said, ah, "I have heard" (and I had heard the same thing) that after they get me there, they're going to demand President Nixon coming as well." And he said, "Under those circumstances, I don't think I should come."

QUESTION 31
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Ok, can I, that was a wonderful answer. I'm going to ask you the same question just to get your answer, not specifically the conversation but just, what was your sense? Did you support the request the Governor come? And did you think he could accomplish anything?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

No, I didn't think he could, ah, I didn't think, if the government, Governor came, he would have accomplished anything at all because they, they were so determined that, ah, ah, they were going to make everyone grovel. And, ah, my difficulty with this whole group was that never did I run into such an, ah, such a group that was, ah, that obdurate, was that, ah, intransigent. Never, they wanted to take everything and give nothing. They wouldn't meet with us at any time. They just insisted on having their own way constantly.

QUESTION 32
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you tell me about the letter that you sent into the facility on Sunday trying to say, let's negotiate directly again because the observers weren't getting anywhere. But it kind of misfired, Arthur Eve actually said it was as good as signing his death warrant. Can you tell me about what was the intent and what happened?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well the intent was that I was in, in, ah, ah--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Don't pay any attention to him.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Ah, I, at all times, was trying to be honest with everyone, the prisoners, the observers, ah, and I couldn't believe that these men would sit and work out this, ah, agenda with me. All that time and all that work, and then say, they weren't part of it. They, they subsequently tried to say, and Arthur Reeve was apparently was one of them, who said, Well, it's my agenda for death. Why? I don't understand that. We all agreed on it. And I merely said, here is what we agreed on, which was true.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could just give it to me a little more people understand what it is you're talking about.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

The set of demands.

QUESTION 33
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

But then you wrote a letter and sent it in to the prisoners on Sunday urging you to start negotiating. Can you tell me about that?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Yeah. I can't remember more than what I told you now.

QUESTION 34
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

What was your sense as time was going by, can you tell me what your sense was, it's sort of the same answer you gave me, of the Observer Committee and particularly some of the people like Eve and Wicker of your sense of what was happening to them in terms of their relationship to the inmates versus their role as negotiators and observers. What was happening.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Many of them were--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

And if you could just give me, many of who, the--

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Many of the observers were becoming completely polarized. Ah, ah, identifying with the prisoners, ah, saying how brilliant they were and how, how, ah, thoughtful they were, and, ah, praising them. And others were more detached and more objective about it. So that there was a dichotomy there between the observers. Some going all to one side and some the other side but the more objective ones staying in the middle and trying to, to work on what they were there for.

QUESTION 35
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

What was behind your decision on Sunday evening to actually forbid the observers from going into the yard again. What was happening? How had things changed?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, ah, a certain individual went into the in.. institution, ah--there were two or three went in alone, not the whole Observers Committee, and we have affidavits from hostages who were being held, that this individual said we should, that they should refuse to give in.

QUESTION 36
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

I'm sorry. I have to stop you. I need to deal only with what you knew at the time based on other information because you didn't have those affidavits yet. Something led you to decide that things had changed and that it was no longer prudent to allow the Observer Committee into the yard, into direct contact with the inmates, on the knowledge you had that Sunday. What had changed? Why did you decide that?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, I decided not to, ah, let them go into, ah, institution anymore because they were polarizing the, this, ah, group in the yard. And, I knew that I had to make a decision soon. I couldn't let it go much longer. And for them to fear, ah--for them to, ah, make matters worse by going into the yard would just make it impossible for us to, to deal with them subsequently, that night or the next morning. As a matter of fact, ah, that night some of them stayed in the yard all night, some of the obs--observers.

QUESTION 37
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Can you think back to Monday morning? What were you thinking? What were you feeling? What led you to decide that the time to come to retake the prison by force? What was happening?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

I decided to take the prison by force for a number of reasons. One, that I obviously had erred in letting a number of these observers, ah, take part in these discussions. I knew that, that, ah, there were, there were increasing dangers for the hostages. Er, a doctor who had been in there several times told us so. I knew that, that they were getting wilder and, and, ah, building more arms all the time, Sam Melville and the others, knives, and, ah, and tanks, ah, ah, things to throw projectiles into the air. And I knew that to let them go in anymore would just alienate all of, ah, us further.

QUESTION 38
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

So, can you tell me about the decision you made and how did you set the chain of events into place?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

We decided, late Sunday night, that unless we could get some movement from the group, ah, the prisoners on Monday morning, that...

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Sorry. Cut.


SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could tell me again, you were telling me about putting the chain of events into place beginning with Sunday night. Sunday night it was decided that if things hadn't--

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, we had heard that there were, ah, some atrocities taking place in the institution. And that there, there was, ah, a restlessness that had been growing. Ah--in addition to that, we knew that we had to prepare if, by any chance, we couldn't deal with them any longer. So that, ah, we decided to, to--decided which we wanted to do, ah, were we going to, ah, take over the institution the next day or not? We decided we, couldn't make up our mind at that time. But we had to prepare for it. And so, we got together, after finishing with the observers and, ah, decided that we would wait until morning. And it was a long, long night--waiting. Do you want me to go on from there?

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Yes.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

It was a, a sleepless night. Meanwhile I tried to etch out, ah, a memorandum that I wanted to send to, to, ah, ah, Clarke. The thing that, ah, we remembered so well was that the night before, ah, they asked me to come into the institution one last time. And I was tempted to do it. On Sunday night they said they needed me to come in. So I went down to the gate and I was considering going in when, all of my staff was there, and said by no means can you go in. So I told Clarke that I would meet him and his lieutenants in the tunnel. And he said, "Well, that sounds alright. Just a minute." And he went back to talk with the, the other people he had with him. And he said, "Alright, we'll do that." So meanwhile, my people told me that, under no circumstances, would they let me go into that tunnel because this was obviously going to be the time they would grab me. They said, you can't go in there. I said, "I'm going to go in there." They said, "We'll let you go in there if you know in advance that our sharpshooters are going to have their guns at ready and stand right in this hall and you go into that tunnel. You have to remember that if they grab you, you have to throw yourself to the floor because we're firing." So, I said, "Alright." So, I started to go to the gate and the men had their rifles leveled. Clarke and the others said, "No, we don't want you." And they walked out. So that that's another thing gave us the feeling that they really didn't want to deal with me.

QUESTION 39
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

So, Monday morning, you made one last effort to negotiate. What happened and what led to the action that was taken?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Ah, on Monday morning I got there early because I was up all night anyhow and I had the memorandum typed. Ah, in which, I told them all of the efforts that I had made all this time and that I wanted him to release the hostages and meet with us outside in any place he suggested and we'd work out the, the difficulties. And he knew that, ah, from the material I had given, given him previously what we planned to give to the prisoners. And I ended it by saying, "I implore you, under these circumstances, to make the decision to meet with us" And I handed it to him. And I said, "You will have a half hour to make up your mind." He said, no. I said, "Fifteen minutes." He said, "I need a half hour." I said, "We'll give you a half an hour." And I said, "Mr. Clarke, I not only beg you to do this but I implore you to do it." And he left and fifteen minutes later they took the hostages up on the catwalk, blindfolded, with, ah, so-called executioner at the neck of all of the eight men who were put on the catwalk. So, with that information, and the fact that he had done that and wouldn't come back, we had the CD already for the helicopters and they called me and told me that, that he hadn't answered. So, we sent the helicopters over with the CD yes[SIC], and we began the retaking of the institution.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

cut for a second.


QUESTION 40
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

If you could just explain once again the three demands that stalled everything, the demand for safe passage to a neutral country, for amnesty. Can you characterize what those demands were. In your book you said that they were not prison reform, those were revolutionary demands. If I asked you what was it about the three immediate demands that the inmates had that you couldn't grant, what was it?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Well, the, the demands that they made that I couldn't, ah, oblige them with or acquiesce with were first, they wanted to be shipped to a non-imperialistic country. Obviously I couldn't do that. I couldn't let them go when, when they're rioting in an institution. Secondly, they asked that they get complete amnesty from prosecution. I couldn't do that for, if they were capital crimes. Three, they asked for the removal of the warden, Mancusi. And I refused to do that which would have been, ah, ridiculous. Everyone, every prison would ask for the removal of the warden the next day if they could do that. The, the great thing, I think, that Warden Mancusi did was, ah, when I refused that, he came to me and said "I'll be glad to resign if you want me to." And I said, "No, I won't take the resignation."

QUESTION 41
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

There's more to it than that. It's sort of the same thing, that you don't trade guns for hostages. There's something about the message it would send to prisons across the country in terms of what you can negotiate and what you won't negotiate if you have to keep a prison in line. Isn't there more to it than that?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

Oh, I, I think that, ah--

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Excuse me for one second. Okay.

RUSSELL OSWALD:

I think that it would be, been foolhardy to, ah, think of, ah, adhering, ah, giving in to any of those demands because it was just more of the same revolutionary, ah, talk. And, ah, prisons all over the country would be faced with this same problem. As a matter of fact, ah, it, ah, gives me no pleasure to say this, but, ah, it's been generally conceded that, ah, ah, this particular decision, ah, has been a deterrent, ah, in prison riots for many years. And, it's sad thing to have to say.

QUESTION 42
SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Let me ask you, what is your response when critics charge, which obviously you know that people have charged, that the State engaged in a, what's been called a turkey shoot, that the prisoners weren't going anywhere, that the force that they took the prison back with was just completely unnecessary. What's your response?

RUSSELL OSWALD:

I've heard people say that it was turkey shoot. I heard, ah, Mr. Williams who was the, one of the top men in the State Police and Captain Monahan of the State Police, lecture to all of their men on at least two occasions that, make certain, no one can ever say that this was a turkey shoot. And it certainly was not. It was planned, carefully planned, so that, that they could do it with the least damage in individual lives. The fact of the matter is, a lot of it changed when they put the men on the, on the tunnels and, at the top of the tunnels, and began to cut them. Things changed at that point.

SHEILA C. BERNARD:

Why it seemed like knowing that taking the prison, somebody is going to get hurt. It also seems like the State was not prepared medically--